From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3E91C1E2.4060502@mvista.com> Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 11:22:26 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini Cc: linuxppc-dev Subject: Re: Patch for PCORE on linuxppc_2_4_devel References: <3E8E2D71.8050707@mvista.com> <20030407174355.GD16622@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20030407174355.GD16622@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini wrote: >On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:12:17PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > > > >>This patch does the following: >>a) Modifies the CONFIG_MORE_COMPILE_OPTIONS setup at the bottom of >>arch/ppc/config.in. The way that it was didn't work well and seemed >>difficult to read. I believe that the new way is "more correct" and >>easier to understand >> >> > >Didn't work well when? Then intent is that if you don't select this >option, you still get -g added when CONFIG_KGDB=y so that you can >effectivly use gdb. > Try playing with it a little... I understand the intent, it just didn't work well. The option is still there with a reasonable default. If they want it, they can use it; if they don't, they don't. If they don't know that they probably want -g if they have KGDB, they'll find out soon enough. Simple. Mark ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/