Re: debugging using bdi2000, unable to proceed.

[Jeff H Zhong <jeff@doremilabs.com>]

I mean just like that on workstation(none embedded linux), user should
be able to at least ping the target at the time when it brings up the
ethernet interface, is it right?

Regards,
--Jeff

> In message <3E9FD84F.2C40F0ED@doremilabs.com> you wrote:
> >
> > Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > >
> > > in message <3E9FB7FD.93947BE5@doremilabs.com> you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Could you give me a hand to help me figure out this issue on ebony?
> > >
> > > I've read your story before, but I cannot help.
> > >
> > > > If I use "bootp" or "tftp" to load kernel image(linuxppc_2_4_devel from
> > > > BK) at address 0x01000000 and then issue "bootm", everything works fine.
> > > > I have also programmed the image into flash at 0xffe00000, but each time
> > > > when I issue "bootm 0xffe00000", it will get stuck at when trying to
> > > > mount NFS.
> > >
> > > Technically there is absolutely no difference between both cases:  in
> > > either  case  U-Boot  will  copy  and  uncompress  the  kernel to RAM
> > > starting at physical adress 0x0000, and start it there.  I  have  not
> > > the slightest idea whaty could cause a behaviour as described by you,
> > > nor have I ever seen anything like that before.
>
> Well, there _is_ one obvious difference: when you use "tftp" to  load
> kernel  then  U-Boot  will  perform the initialization of the network
> interface. You can perform a simple test for this:
>
> Do a dummy TFTP download, and then try  to  "bootm"  the  image  from
> flash. I bet it'll work.

--
Jeff H. Zhong
-------------
Doremi Labs, Inc.
306 East Alameda Avenue
Burbank, CA 91502

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/