From: Jeff H Zhong <jeff@doremilabs.com>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: debugging using bdi2000, unable to proceed.
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:12:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EA023F2.820B65C0@doremilabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030418222217.E5F71C58B9@atlas.denx.de
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
We may need one more variable to be passed to kernel and let kernel know
if we want initialize ethernet or not?
--Jeff
> > Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > >
> > > in message <3E9FB7FD.93947BE5@doremilabs.com> you wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Could you give me a hand to help me figure out this issue on ebony?
> > >
> > > I've read your story before, but I cannot help.
> > >
> > > > If I use "bootp" or "tftp" to load kernel image(linuxppc_2_4_devel from
> > > > BK) at address 0x01000000 and then issue "bootm", everything works fine.
> > > > I have also programmed the image into flash at 0xffe00000, but each time
> > > > when I issue "bootm 0xffe00000", it will get stuck at when trying to
> > > > mount NFS.
> > >
> > > Technically there is absolutely no difference between both cases: in
> > > either case U-Boot will copy and uncompress the kernel to RAM
> > > starting at physical adress 0x0000, and start it there. I have not
> > > the slightest idea whaty could cause a behaviour as described by you,
> > > nor have I ever seen anything like that before.
>
> Well, there _is_ one obvious difference: when you use "tftp" to load
> kernel then U-Boot will perform the initialization of the network
> interface. You can perform a simple test for this:
>
> Do a dummy TFTP download, and then try to "bootm" the image from
> flash. I bet it'll work.
--
Jeff H. Zhong
-------------
Doremi Labs, Inc.
306 East Alameda Avenue
Burbank, CA 91502
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-18 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030418160238.8EB5BC58B9@atlas.denx.de>
2003-04-18 10:49 ` debugging using bdi2000, unable to proceed Jeff H Zhong
2003-04-18 22:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-04-18 15:59 ` Jeff H Zhong
2003-04-18 23:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-04-18 16:12 ` Jeff H Zhong [this message]
2003-04-18 23:24 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-04-17 13:10 Omanakuttan
2003-04-17 13:45 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-04-18 11:43 ` Omanakuttan
2003-04-18 14:51 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EA023F2.820B65C0@doremilabs.com \
--to=jeff@doremilabs.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).