From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3ED4998F.8010108@embeddededge.com> Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 07:12:15 -0400 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Seb James , rtai@rtai.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: timebase interrupts on an mpc8xx References: <20030527200329.D7EEFC6162@atlas.denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I disagree. I think Wolfgang Grandegger is right; Sorry, I didn't see any other replies to this message. > ... it's caused by > reading sivec without a pending interrupt. What? That had been updated a long time ago, is it missing again? > BTW: it seems the interrupt handling code becomes worse. I guess you > don't care about this any more? I care alot. There have been changes I have totally disagreed with, but they were checked in anyway. Not much I can do about it but hope I get time to fix it in the future. > ... At least it was working when you > did... Now the 2_4_devel code is crap. I agree, but it wasn't my choice. People that don't even use the code seemed to this was the way to go.......... -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/