From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3F124BF5.6070803@intracom.gr> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:21:41 +0300 From: Pantelis Antoniou MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini Cc: Wolfgang Denk , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Ethernet PHY chip discovery not working on 855T with 971/972 chips References: <20030711155226.GV17433@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <20030711182921.0F0CFC6D82@atlas.denx.de> <20030711185050.GB17433@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20030711185050.GB17433@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Tom Rini wrote: >On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:29:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > [snip] > >>IIRC the last time we such discussions simply nothing happened: see >>for example to code for dp_alloc / dp_free that was submitted several >>times. >> > >google knows nothing of this, can you give a pointer into the thread >please? Thanks. > > I was the one that sent the patches (search for dpalloc). A link to the thread in the archive is here. http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-embedded/200212/msg00302.html As it stands I maintain them for the linuxppc_2_4_devel tree and I'm waiting for the 2.5 to build in order to port them there and resubmit. > >-- >Tom Rini >http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ > > > > > Regards Pantelis ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/