linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Questions about ARP
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 17:04:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F33BC10.8060407@imc-berlin.de> (raw)


Hi there,

Microsoft uses "Automatic Private IP Addressing" to grab an IP address
if a DHCP request fails.

In the section "Resolving IP Conflicts" in
http://www.winnetmag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7464
it says

How does the client know the IP address it's using isn't in use by
another machine? It uses a gratuitous Address Resolution Protocol
(ARP) to resolve potential conflicts. Let’s say the first client that
boots up wants to assign itself an IP address of 169.254.10.20. It
sends out a gratuitous ARP, but no one answers, so it keeps the
address ... Next, a third client boots up and picks 169.254.10.20, the
same address the first client chose. The first client tells the third
client that it's already using that IP address, so the third client
tries a different IP address and keeps it if there's no conflict.

I can see this behaviour if I connect an embedded DOS TCP/IP device to
a Windows XP computer (using a cross-linked twisted pair) and force
the IP of the DOS device to be the same as the one that the Windows XP
computer is going to claim. Fair enough.

But when I connect my MPC8xx board with Linux it seems that Linux is
not responding to the ARP requests done by the Windows machine.
Result: Both machine end up with the same IP address.

Did I miss something?
I did not find an kernel option saying something about ARP...

Any ideas?

Could someone maybe try this as well? Please?

Thanks a million,

Steven


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2003-08-08 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-08 15:04 Steven Scholz [this message]
2003-08-08 18:24 ` Questions about ARP Dan Malek
2003-08-12 12:34   ` Steven Scholz
2003-08-12 13:56     ` Build issues with 2.6.0-test3 Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:25       ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39         ` Matt Porter
2003-08-12 15:40         ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:46           ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 19:13             ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 21:54               ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 23:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-08-12 22:23                   ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39     ` Questions about ARP Dan Malek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-12 14:05 Dave Ellis
2003-08-12 15:40 ` Dan Malek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F33BC10.8060407@imc-berlin.de \
    --to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).