From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Cc: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
Brad Parker <brad@parker.boston.ma.us>
Subject: Re: Questions about ARP
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:39:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F390A32.5040507@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F38DEC4.8050708@imc-berlin.de
Steven Scholz wrote:
> Windows is checking for duplicate addresses using ARP packets with
> source _and_
> destination address set to the address in question. So of course Linux
> won't answer it!
>
> But I can't find a single word in the RFC2131
> (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2131.html)
> saying that the Source Address _must_ set to 0.0.0.0!!!!
I don't remember if it was in RFC2131 or RFC1541. RFC2131 is an updated
version of RFC1541, so I thought the words would still be there. In
any case it suggests as part of a DHCP the client tests to ensure the
address isn't already in use by sending a ARP using the sender hardware
address and setting the sender IP address to zero to avoid confusing
ARP caches in other hosts on the network. I don't remember the exact
words, but RFCs tend to be terse and concise in the area where you
need to pay attention to detail :-)
I'd suggest using the linux kernel or some networking mailing lists
to discuss this. I wouldn't apply this patch because it seems to be
wrong in the eyes of the RFCs, and I could never get it pushed into
the network portion of the source tree.
Thanks.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-12 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-08 15:04 Questions about ARP Steven Scholz
2003-08-08 18:24 ` Dan Malek
2003-08-12 12:34 ` Steven Scholz
2003-08-12 13:56 ` Build issues with 2.6.0-test3 Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-12 15:40 ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:46 ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 19:13 ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 21:54 ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 23:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-08-12 22:23 ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39 ` Dan Malek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-12 14:05 Questions about ARP Dave Ellis
2003-08-12 15:40 ` Dan Malek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F390A32.5040507@embeddededge.com \
--to=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=brad@parker.boston.ma.us \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).