linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Cc: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Brad Parker <brad@parker.boston.ma.us>
Subject: Re: Questions about ARP
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:39:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F390A32.5040507@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F38DEC4.8050708@imc-berlin.de


Steven Scholz wrote:

> Windows is checking for duplicate addresses using ARP packets with
> source _and_
> destination address set to the address in question. So of course Linux
> won't answer it!
>
> But I can't find a single word in the RFC2131
> (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2131.html)
> saying that the Source Address _must_ set to 0.0.0.0!!!!

I don't remember if it was in RFC2131 or RFC1541.  RFC2131 is an updated
version of RFC1541, so I thought the words would still be there.  In
any case it suggests as part of a DHCP the client tests to ensure the
address isn't already in use by sending a ARP using the sender hardware
address and setting the sender IP address to zero to avoid confusing
ARP caches in other hosts on the network.  I don't remember the exact
words, but RFCs tend to be terse and concise in the area where you
need to pay attention to detail :-)

I'd suggest using the linux kernel or some networking mailing lists
to discuss this.  I wouldn't apply this patch because it seems to be
wrong in the eyes of the RFCs, and I could never get it pushed into
the network portion of the source tree.

Thanks.


	-- Dan


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-12 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-08 15:04 Questions about ARP Steven Scholz
2003-08-08 18:24 ` Dan Malek
2003-08-12 12:34   ` Steven Scholz
2003-08-12 13:56     ` Build issues with 2.6.0-test3 Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:25       ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39         ` Matt Porter
2003-08-12 15:40         ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 15:46           ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 19:13             ` Gary Thomas
2003-08-12 21:54               ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 23:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-08-12 22:23                   ` Tom Rini
2003-08-12 15:39     ` Dan Malek [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-12 14:05 Questions about ARP Dave Ellis
2003-08-12 15:40 ` Dan Malek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F390A32.5040507@embeddededge.com \
    --to=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=brad@parker.boston.ma.us \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).