From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: Linuxppc-Embedded <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Problems w/ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MPC8xx_IDE
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:29:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F65B091.1020802@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1063627208.14615.21.camel@trantor.staff.proxad.net>
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:31, Steven Scholz wrote:
>
>
>>The BK linuxppc_2_4_devel tree has another problem as well:
>>
>>drivers/ide/idedriver.o: In function `probe_hwif':
>>drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.text+0x11a30): undefined reference to `wait_hwif_ready'
>>drivers/ide/idedriver.o(.text+0x11a30): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24
>>wait_hwif_ready
>>
>>ide-probe.c contains a call for wait_hwif_ready(), which is not defined.
>>This function exisists in the vanilla source though!
>>
>>I supposed something went wrong while merging/syncing the IDE changes from the
>>official tree...
>
>
> Change 'wait_hwif_ready' by 'ide_wait_hwif_ready' in both ide-probe.c
> and ide.c
Ok. This obviously fixes it.
I just noticed that I might have used the wrong source tree.
So which is the BK tree to use:
linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ???
Thanks,
Steven
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-15 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 7:40 Problems w/ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MPC8xx_IDE Steven Scholz
2003-09-15 11:31 ` Steven Scholz
2003-09-15 12:00 ` Hubert Figuiere
2003-09-15 12:29 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2003-09-15 15:16 ` Tom Rini
2003-09-16 8:42 ` Steven Scholz
2003-09-17 15:08 ` Tom Rini
2003-09-18 9:25 ` Steven Scholz
2003-09-18 18:05 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F65B091.1020802@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).