From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3F699255.4050000@imc-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:09:09 +0200
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: BOOT_TARGET pImage & uImage ???
References: <3F65917D.1020502@imc-berlin.de> <20030915150935.GB29517@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030915150935.GB29517@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


Tom Rini wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:16:29PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
>
>
>>is the there any particular reason why the BOOT_TARGETS "pImage" and
>>"uImage" for
>>the famous boot loader PPCBoot and its successor U-Boot are still not
>>supported.
>>Neither by linux_2_4_devel. Nor by the vanilla.
>
>
> For a third time:
> http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/8358/2002/11/0/10241415/

I have to admit that I don't understand what you're describing there. I am afraid
nobody else did. Otherwise someone would realized it by now...

Sorry though.

Steven


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/