From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3F7DB265.8050408@kegel.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 10:31:17 -0700 From: Dan Kegel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacky Lam Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Queston about Walnut References: <20031002121733.A2E32C59E4@atlas.denx.de> <001101c3894c$38833ab0$2803050a@JackyLam> <3F7D3238.2090400@bluewin.ch> <00df01c38992$6d179b40$2803050a@JackyLam> <3F7D9F72.9020700@kegel.com> <001b01c389cd$c3f30310$0202a8c0@homevl9biy3v7e> In-Reply-To: <001b01c389cd$c3f30310$0202a8c0@homevl9biy3v7e> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Jacky Lam wrote: > I upgrade my gcc to 3.3.1 on my host and start to compile my cross > toolchain. However, while it is compiling gcc, it has strange error that I > have never seen (seems gcc has made something that ld can't understand). So, > I guess gcc 3.3.1 may not work very well with my old glibc (provided in > RedHat 7.2). I don't know how to upgrade glibc safely and make it compatible > to existing applications. That's why I would like to upgrade the whole > Redhat.....and this is painful... I see. Well, you can always build and install a newer binutils; that's not painful, and might get you past the problem. (If you post the error message, we might be able to help.) But I agree that doing a fresh install of e.g. Red Hat 9 is nicer than keeping an old system alive by little patches (unless you're going for an uptime record). >># Download bk from http://www.bitkeeper.com >>bk clone -r$1 bk://ppc.bkserver.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel > > I use CVS to grab the linuxppc-2.4-devel module. Is it the same as > that? Thanks. Probably. I dunno. - Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045 ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/