From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3FBA2959.80609@g-house.de> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:14:49 +0100 From: Christian Kujau MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: ppc32 lockups with 2.6 References: <3FA5698A.9000905@g-house.de> <3FAABE62.4090804@g-house.de> <20031110125044.A22030@forte.austin.ibm.com> <3FB01392.60500@g-house.de> <20031110175740.A32176@forte.austin.ibm.com> <3FB02C85.6090400@g-house.de> <20031111153658.GH8584@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <3FB2D757.1010304@g-house.de> <20031113174745.GA11560@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <3FB41A14.3040108@g-house.de> <3FBA11AC.8090408@g-house.de> In-Reply-To: <3FBA11AC.8090408@g-house.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Christian Kujau wrote: > i will go on with 2.6.0-tes5 now.... no strange error messages anymore with -test5, but still no routing. i someone wants to have a look: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/ (i've re-orderd the links, sorry. the "my PReP machine (ppc32) doesn't like the new kernel" are the right ones.) Thanks, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #179: multicasts on broken packets ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/