From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3FCF3EB7.5080404@embeddededge.com> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 09:03:35 -0500 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Kromer Cc: "Linuxppc-Embedded (E-mail)" Subject: Re: memory problem with fec on 8250 References: <3FCD956B.8030604@gazeta.pl> <3FCEF441.2030808@dgt-lab.com.pl> <20031204091536.GA1050@gate.ebshome.net> <3FCF0252.7070202@dgt-lab.com.pl> <20031204101901.GB1050@gate.ebshome.net> <3FCF0E68.4010303@dgt-lab.com.pl> <20031204105532.GA2065@gate.ebshome.net> <3FCF19C3.9070205@dgt-lab.com.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Wojciech Kromer wrote: > _anyone_ knows why there is such difference between allocs and frees in > fcc_enet.c What kernel and driver is this? The latest one I checked into linuxppc_2_4_devel a long time ago had the benefit of being tested at the UNH Interoperability Laboratory. This included performance testing and error recovery. For this driver to be failing, it must have been modified from that version and we need to determine what was done to get it corrected. Thanks. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/