From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: ajd@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, cmr@codefail.de,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com,
dja@axtens.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/8] powerpc: Set ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 07:35:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a1eef8c-a982-5321-bb1a-7a4ebe73f1d2@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210506023449.3568630-7-jniethe5@gmail.com>
Le 06/05/2021 à 04:34, Jordan Niethe a écrit :
> From: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
>
> To enable strict module RWX on powerpc, set:
>
> CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX=y
>
> You should also have CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX=y set to have any real
> security benefit.
>
> ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX is set to require ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX.
> This is due to a quirk in arch/Kconfig and arch/powerpc/Kconfig that
> makes STRICT_MODULE_RWX *on by default* in configurations where
> STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is *unavailable*.
>
> Since this doesn't make much sense, and module RWX without kernel RWX
> doesn't make much sense, having the same dependencies as kernel RWX
> works around this problem.
>
> With STRICT_MODULE_RWX, now make module_alloc() allocate pages with
> KERNEL_PAGE protection rather than KERNEL_PAGE_EXEC.
>
> Book32s/32 processors with a hash mmu (i.e. 604 core) can not set memory
> protection on a page by page basis so do not enable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
> [jpn: - predicate on !PPC_BOOK3S_604
> - make module_alloc() use PAGE_KERNEL protection]
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
> ---
> v10: - Predicate on !PPC_BOOK3S_604
> - Make module_alloc() use PAGE_KERNEL protection
> v11: - Neaten up
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index cce0a137b046..cb5d9d862c35 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ config PPC
> select ARCH_HAS_SCALED_CPUTIME if VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE && PPC_BOOK3S_64
> select ARCH_HAS_SET_MEMORY
> select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if ((PPC_BOOK3S_64 || PPC32) && !HIBERNATION)
> + select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX && !PPC_BOOK3S_604
> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE
> select ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC if PPC64
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> index 3f35c8d20be7..33e4011228b0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/module.c
> @@ -92,12 +92,14 @@ int module_finalize(const Elf_Ehdr *hdr,
> static __always_inline void *
> __module_alloc(unsigned long size, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> + pgprot_t prot = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) ? PAGE_KERNEL :
> + PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC;
I'm not sure this test is OK, because strict kernel/module rwx can be disabled at boottime.
There is a global variable 'rodata_enabled' to reflect that.
We have a helper in powerpc asm/mmu.h called strict_kernel_rwx_enabled() to check it.
> /*
> * Don't do huge page allocations for modules yet until more testing
> * is done. STRICT_MODULE_RWX may require extra work to support this
> * too.
> */
> - return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, start, end, GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC,
> + return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, start, end, GFP_KERNEL, prot,
> VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS | VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP,
> NUMA_NO_NODE, __builtin_return_address(0));
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-07 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 2:34 [PATCH v12 0/8] powerpc: Further Strict RWX support Jordan Niethe
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 1/8] powerpc/mm: Implement set_memory() routines Jordan Niethe
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 2/8] powerpc/lib/code-patching: Set up Strict RWX patching earlier Jordan Niethe
2021-05-07 5:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 3/8] powerpc/kprobes: Mark newly allocated probes as ROX Jordan Niethe
2021-05-07 5:34 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 4/8] powerpc/bpf: Remove bpf_jit_free() Jordan Niethe
2021-05-07 5:51 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 5/8] powerpc/bpf: Write protect JIT code Jordan Niethe
2021-05-07 5:53 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 6/8] powerpc: Set ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX Jordan Niethe
2021-05-07 5:35 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-05-10 0:52 ` Jordan Niethe
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 7/8] powerpc/mm: implement set_memory_attr() Jordan Niethe
2021-05-06 2:34 ` [PATCH v12 8/8] powerpc/32: use set_memory_attr() Jordan Niethe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a1eef8c-a982-5321-bb1a-7a4ebe73f1d2@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cmr@codefail.de \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).