From: "Sven Peter" <sven@svenpeter.dev>
To: "Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Cc: "Janne Grunau" <j@jannau.net>,
"Alyssa Rosenzweig" <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Naveen N Rao" <naveen@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
asahi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Hector Martin" <marcan@marcan.st>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: pasemi: Improve error recovery
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:25:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a849f4d-2cea-458a-9045-b2ae98d4293d@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mp77oombs4xgr6sjj44ne7muybfrwejgehzv5xupeanh6udui3@ymgfesctindh>
Hi Andi,
Thanks for the review! Will send a v2 after -rc1 is out.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, at 01:17, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 01:38:34PM +0000, Sven Peter via B4 Relay wrote:
>> The hardware (supposedly) has a 25ms timeout for clock stretching
>> and the driver uses 100ms which should be plenty.
>
> Can we add this lines as a comment to the define you are adding?
Sure.
>
>> The error
>> reocvery itself is however lacking.
>
> ...
>
>> -static void pasemi_smb_clear(struct pasemi_smbus *smbus)
>> +static int pasemi_smb_clear(struct pasemi_smbus *smbus)
>> {
>> unsigned int status;
>> + int timeout = TRANSFER_TIMEOUT_MS;
>>
>> status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);
>> +
>> + /* First wait for the bus to go idle */
>> + while ((status & (SMSTA_XIP | SMSTA_JAM)) && timeout--) {
>> + msleep(1);
>
> Please, use usleep_range for 1 millisecond timeout.
Ack.
>
>> + status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);
>> + }
>
> You could use here readx_poll_timeout() here.
Yup, that should work.
>
>> +
>> + if (timeout < 0) {
>> + dev_warn(smbus->dev, "Bus is still stuck (status 0x%08x)\n", status);
>
> if it's an error, please use an error.
Ack.
>
>> + return -EIO;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* If any badness happened or there is data in the FIFOs, reset the FIFOs */
>> + if ((status & (SMSTA_MRNE | SMSTA_JMD | SMSTA_MTO | SMSTA_TOM | SMSTA_MTN | SMSTA_MTA)) ||
>> + !(status & SMSTA_MTE))
>
> Please, fixe the alignment here.
Ok.
>
>> + pasemi_reset(smbus);
>> +
>> + /* Clear the flags */
>> reg_write(smbus, REG_SMSTA, status);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int pasemi_smb_waitready(struct pasemi_smbus *smbus)
>> {
>> - int timeout = 100;
>> + int timeout = TRANSFER_TIMEOUT_MS;
>> unsigned int status;
>>
>> if (smbus->use_irq) {
>> reinit_completion(&smbus->irq_completion);
>> - reg_write(smbus, REG_IMASK, SMSTA_XEN | SMSTA_MTN);
>> - wait_for_completion_timeout(&smbus->irq_completion, msecs_to_jiffies(100));
>> + /* XEN should be set when a transaction terminates, whether due to error or not */
>> + reg_write(smbus, REG_IMASK, SMSTA_XEN);
>> + wait_for_completion_timeout(&smbus->irq_completion, msecs_to_jiffies(timeout));
>
> what happens if the timeout expires?
I think that can only happen if the hardware is seriously broken because
it's always supposed to set XEN. I'll make sure to catch that case in v2
though and print a separate error message similar to how the polling case
below is taken care of right now.
>
>> reg_write(smbus, REG_IMASK, 0);
>> status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);
>> } else {
>
> ...
>
>> struct pasemi_smbus *smbus = adapter->algo_data;
>> int ret, i;
>>
>> - pasemi_smb_clear(smbus);
>> + if (pasemi_smb_clear(smbus))
>> + return -EIO;
>
> Can we use
>
> ret = ...
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> This way we return whatever comes from pasemi_smb_clear().
>
>>
>> ret = 0;
>
> This way we can remove this line, as well.
Sure, will do both for v2.
Thanks,
Sven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-22 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-22 13:38 [PATCH 0/4] Apple/PASemi i2c error recovery fixes Sven Peter via B4 Relay
2025-02-22 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] i2c: pasemi: Add registers bits and switch to BIT() Sven Peter via B4 Relay
2025-03-20 0:23 ` Andi Shyti
2025-03-22 13:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-30 8:50 ` Sven Peter
2025-02-22 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] i2c: pasemi: Improve error recovery Sven Peter via B4 Relay
2025-03-20 0:17 ` Andi Shyti
2025-03-22 10:25 ` Sven Peter [this message]
2025-02-22 13:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] i2c: pasemi: Enable the unjam machine Sven Peter via B4 Relay
2025-02-22 13:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] i2c: pasemi: Log bus reset causes Sven Peter via B4 Relay
2025-02-24 18:14 ` [PATCH 0/4] Apple/PASemi i2c error recovery fixes Alyssa Rosenzweig
2025-02-24 21:48 ` Neal Gompa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a849f4d-2cea-458a-9045-b2ae98d4293d@app.fastmail.com \
--to=sven@svenpeter.dev \
--cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=j@jannau.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=marcan@marcan.st \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).