From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527F2DDEB6 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:03:11 +1000 (EST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k40so791146ugc for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2007 07:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3cea2ee30707210703p5865ef77j103eb9e7499dd95b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 10:03:09 -0400 From: "Andrew Gallatin" To: "Jan-Bernd Themann" Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] lro: Generic Large Receive Offload for TCP traffic In-Reply-To: <200707201741.45079.ossthema@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed References: <200707201741.45079.ossthema@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Klein , Jeff Garzik , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Christoph Raisch , Marcus Eder , Stefan Roscher , David Miller List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 7/20/07, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for your comments so far. > This generic LRO patch differs from the last one in several points. > A new interface for a "receive in pages" mode has been added and tested > with an eHEA prototype. Seems to work well. > > Does this extended interface seem to be sufficient? Thank you for this! At least for me, I find it is best to try to use an interface rather than simply reading a diff. So I will port Myri10GE to use the new interface so that I can give better feedback, I'll try my best to do this by early next week. Thank you again, Drew