From: Ganesh <ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Fix MCE handling on pseries
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 20:05:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d8acf3d-4996-3b4d-bc06-0ef7525035bb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1584437866.2pbq6ca4ia.astroid@bobo.none>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3197 bytes --]
On 3/17/20 3:31 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Ganesh's on March 16, 2020 9:47 pm:
>>
>> On 3/14/20 9:18 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> Ganesh Goudar's on March 14, 2020 12:04 am:
>>>> MCE handling on pSeries platform fails as recent rework to use common
>>>> code for pSeries and PowerNV in machine check error handling tries to
>>>> access per-cpu variables in realmode. The per-cpu variables may be
>>>> outside the RMO region on pSeries platform and needs translation to be
>>>> enabled for access. Just moving these per-cpu variable into RMO region
>>>> did'nt help because we queue some work to workqueues in real mode, which
>>>> again tries to touch per-cpu variables.
>>> Which queues are these? We should not be using Linux workqueues, but the
>>> powerpc mce code which uses irq_work.
>> Yes, irq work queues accesses memory outside RMO.
>> irq_work_queue()->__irq_work_queue_local()->[this_cpu_ptr(&lazy_list) | this_cpu_ptr(&raised_list)]
> Hmm, okay.
>
>>>> Also fwnmi_release_errinfo()
>>>> cannot be called when translation is not enabled.
>>> Why not?
>> It crashes when we try to get RTAS token for "ibm, nmi-interlock" device
>> tree node. But yes we can avoid it by storing it rtas_token somewhere but haven't
>> tried it, here is the backtrace I got when fwnmi_release_errinfo() called from
>> realmode handler.
> Okay, I actually had problems with that messing up soft-irq state too
> and so I sent a patch to get rid of it, but that's the least of your
> problems really.
>
>>>> This patch fixes this by enabling translation in the exception handler
>>>> when all required real mode handling is done. This change only affects
>>>> the pSeries platform.
>>> Not supposed to do this, because we might not be in a state
>>> where the MMU is ready to be turned on at this point.
>>>
>>> I'd like to understand better which accesses are a problem, and whether
>>> we can fix them all to be in the RMO.
>> I faced three such access problems,
>> * accessing per-cpu data (like mce_event,mce_event_queue and mce_event_queue),
>> we can move this inside RMO.
>> * calling fwnmi_release_errinfo().
>> * And queuing work to irq_work_queue, not sure how to fix this.
> Yeah. The irq_work_queue one is the biggest problem.
>
> This code "worked" prior to the series unifying pseries and powernv
> machine check handlers, 9ca766f9891d ("powerpc/64s/pseries: machine
> check convert to use common event code") and friends. But it does in
> basically the same way as your fix (i.e., it runs this early handler
> in virtual mode), but that's not really the right fix.
>
> Consider: you get a SLB multi hit on a kernel address due to hardware or
> software error. That access causes a MCE, but before the error can be
> decode to save and flush the SLB, you turn on relocation and that
> causes another SLB multi hit...
We turn on relocation only after all the realmode handling/recovery is done
like SLB flush and reload, All we do after we turn relocation on is saving
mce event to array and queuing the work to irq_workqueue.
So we are good to turn it on here.
> I think the irq_work subsystem will have to be changed to use an array
> unfortunately.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4803 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-18 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-13 14:04 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: Fix MCE handling on pseries Ganesh Goudar
2020-03-14 3:48 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-16 11:47 ` Ganesh
2020-03-17 10:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-17 14:35 ` Ganesh [this message]
2020-03-20 2:41 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-20 9:09 ` Ganesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d8acf3d-4996-3b4d-bc06-0ef7525035bb@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).