From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6C5C4338F for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 522B060F01 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:07:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 522B060F01 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Gb75r00Nbz3cPK for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 21:07:12 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.187; helo=szxga01-in.huawei.com; envelope-from=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com; receiver=) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Gb75L32rxz3bmj for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 21:06:43 +1000 (AEST) Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Gb70b6fynzZqYW; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:02:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:06:08 +0800 Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:06:08 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] kallsyms: Rename is_kernel() and is_kernel_text() To: Steven Rostedt References: <20210728081320.20394-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <20210728081320.20394-6-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <20210728112836.289865f5@oasis.local.home> <1551f9cc-eaf8-efef-0590-e2549eebe4ae@huawei.com> <20210729000531.7c4da1f1@oasis.local.home> From: Kefeng Wang Message-ID: <3dc2f31a-2dad-fefc-b974-8433be4c190f@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 19:06:07 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210729000531.7c4da1f1@oasis.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.243] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com, Daniel Borkmann , arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor , mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org, Sami Tolvanen , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 2021/7/29 12:05, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:00:51 +0800 > Kefeng Wang wrote: > >> On 2021/7/28 23:28, Steven Rostedt wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:13:18 +0800 >>> Kefeng Wang wrote: >>> >>>> The is_kernel[_text]() function check the address whether or not >>>> in kernel[_text] ranges, also they will check the address whether >>>> or not in gate area, so use better name. >>> Do you know what a gate area is? >>> >>> Because I believe gate area is kernel text, so the rename just makes it >>> redundant and more confusing. >> Yes, the gate area(eg, vectors part on ARM32, similar on x86/ia64) is >> kernel text. >> >> I want to keep the 'basic' section boundaries check, which only check >> the start/end >> >> of sections, all in section.h,  could we use 'generic' or 'basic' or >> 'core' in the naming? >> >> * is_kernel_generic_data() --- come from core_kernel_data() in kernel.h >> * is_kernel_generic_text() >> >> The old helper could remain unchanged, any suggestion, thanks. > Because it looks like the check of just being in the range of "_stext" > to "_end" is just an internal helper, why not do what we do all over > the kernel, and just prefix the function with a couple of underscores, > that denote that it's internal? > > __is_kernel_text() OK， thanks for your advise,  there's already a __is_kernel_text() in arch/x86/mm/init_32.c, I will change it to is_x32_kernel_text() to avoid conflict on x86_32. > > Then you have: > > static inline int is_kernel_text(unsigned long addr) > { > if (__is_kernel_text(addr)) > return 1; > return in_gate_area_no_mm(addr); > } > > -- Steve > . >