From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AFBC28CF8 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 23:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB1020644 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 23:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rZHJJbm3" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DBB1020644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42WSCq4qqTzF3KQ for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:41:27 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rZHJJbm3"; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::642; helo=mail-pl1-x642.google.com; envelope-from=frowand.list@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rZHJJbm3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42WS8V5D7CzF3Jc for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 10:38:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id c8-v6so4955697plo.9 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:38:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t6GwcdCmvHVmWHnU8eJW6l7ZDMJAfp7RCaTcJxdx/zA=; b=rZHJJbm3PvBVSdCMZP8qXB3sKbmgQ/EjNxIJDWKai5O84gWTGJinMy2urG5VEE3DSQ z8gRL634ALxT0lZB+MmIz2xts27L0BEC5eJMRIIgMpjqtib3kHJTtNHPFfJnERieRM3I EIxUCsOKqKuhrss+UaTOAnS5DBHCvW3ibJOHYoFqHXyP0IiQyK44E7n9/LOleqncGg2d x+T1KEz9n64ThnqPR3GUU86pLwqSgSpeW/qZormkcizBNqDXonx4ZFn1VxdBn7GLs1JN MUYYztbtWMIDgAmqqCFRPwcXJ4wPxcQjj1jdZRcfHrCIP7egGqvRvdQJ7XFMKAJlv6Vd rn6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=t6GwcdCmvHVmWHnU8eJW6l7ZDMJAfp7RCaTcJxdx/zA=; b=C6DiMBpGF3kv+eiTiUdhzzgJtpZOEjNubOO2xHBb5H97zSbgpkGpANWMp3ZgmHAI80 TbTCsaz3P94nZSZhel6Sbe4lH54VrZXYfMhDdDGPs9cvQCcvDHJNebMEYVKeQ1oPoRCV eBN0LS8YrK37ZEmLh+gH+Ayb/0eTAn74syrnWS5v/G2SJm23ooFRKBS0JeCjv3vVcb5t gRdesYO6sHjecAOqV2V0OJLQQX97F80xUST6ovO8pXFhro7reWqOvCflgo4fBMJ3Kukc jLl+AGcVQQzeJ+I4tJ4Bm2y2sowDZ742CqCsugbptIxOU2KZMYZR4Esi5qcGfVo9EfO6 B+2A== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohIuEelw6HHUBYbmjVerhkwwpPBuYlGDK4FV9X66uPwyx3dHGq8 onH/yzhwfsg5r3njLj0t4H0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61ftv77dVVnQZzKYqpNBpEg+lWfsMpFPOy7DsX3qEnOtIO6FppfQ+CLsdxXXJgYUwKhKLFJgg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4a0c:: with SMTP id w12-v6mr3400664pld.289.1539301112384; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.70] (c-24-6-192-50.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.6.192.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2-v6sm40069238pfd.100.2018.10.11.16.38.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 05.1/16] of:overlay: missing name, phandle, linux, phandle in new nodes To: Alan Tull References: <1539151495-8110-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> From: Frank Rowand Message-ID: <3f36468b-676a-558d-4180-7129d2bf2c6c@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:38:26 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, Pantelis Antoniou , linux-kernel , Rob Herring , Moritz Fischer , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 10/11/18 12:33, Alan Tull wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:39 AM Frank Rowand wrote: > > [resend of my messed up rejected email of a minute ago, sorry] > >> >> On 10/10/18 14:03, Frank Rowand wrote: < snip > > I understand you're quite busy with all this, but I'm wondering > whether it might be worth it go ahead and make the properties be > kernel objects also at this point. That would be an improvement for > the case of overlay properties added to non-overlay nodes, so the > lifespan of the overlay property memory can be coupled with the > properties kobj's instead of the node kobj's. > > Alan > That is one of the approaches that I am thinking about to handle the potential memory leaks from those properties. I'd like to make these changes in a step wise fashion, to let each major change get some exposure and use before moving on to the next step. Making properties into kernel objects would impact a lot of code. So not in this series. But thanks for thinking about it. -Frank