From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6268C433E2 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7FB2072A for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="P/1oVpN+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1A7FB2072A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BhqGQ6vPNzDr3Y for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:33:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=P/1oVpN+; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BhqDM6GFHzDr2g for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:31:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08352OFG053557; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 01:31:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=4HGc7/6+Pw+aIlehXfflhn1TuMbzH3zeJUxuQa5CQaE=; b=P/1oVpN+XIULm43HcP2/i56HkLqraf+8hhOq+RhppUR7w608E83av0w1QuErodbyDu7g HsYoQUzYMtQopLWsvf9AmGGhezqig+UP7oSG4ZEHhxb+TnHU6WLkZgETnRc0mHlWxtlx 8kmPut7cPoLhvKs4te2A1feiCVjudwFC4KWTX5zt1ZqK/Oj1hxbPqh7R7XZrPOdU/fu2 YRF0+E8eWOwntx4gkxjHBqocmbWRBMQmHR8v25VLTu7jPevH1jIP740MONg1Jr02Fuw+ TDFW+7BQ6gQAK1RRdY9dppIIG0/sHM0wFvmUKPE2MH4gKF4o8cTWpCnFO/a9qQWyF5dT 6g== Received: from ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (83.d6.3fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.63.214.131]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33ahswv4bh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Sep 2020 01:31:24 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0835RTXg015452; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:31:23 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by ppma01dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 337en9xnd5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 03 Sep 2020 05:31:23 +0000 Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.110]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0835VMwQ41681180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:31:23 GMT Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC015AE060; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021E3AE068; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:31:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc6857751186.ibm.com (unknown [9.65.215.230]) by b01ledav005.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 05:31:21 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ibmvfc: interface updates for future FPIN and MQ support To: "Martin K. Petersen" References: <20200901002420.648532-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> From: Tyrel Datwyler Message-ID: <3fe3e9be-9671-aa0a-b18b-10f77433ab56@linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 22:31:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-02_17:2020-09-02, 2020-09-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009030042 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 9/2/20 7:11 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Tyrel, > >> Fixup complier errors from neglected commit --amend > > Bunch of formatting-related checkpatch warnings. Please fix. > > Thanks! > So, I stuck to the existing style already in that header. If I'm going to fixup to make checkpatch happy I imagine it makes sense to send a prerequisite patch that fixes up the rest of the header. -Tyrel