From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:38:39 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3qV9fR1t3Bz9sDb@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458606895-24620-1-git-send-email-ruscur@russell.cc>
On Tue, 2016-22-03 at 00:34:55 UTC, Russell Currey wrote:
> In the configure_pe and configure_bridge RTAS calls, the spec states
> that values of 9900-9905 can be returned, indicating that software
> should delay for 10^x (where x is the last digit, i.e. 990x)
> milliseconds and attempt the call again. Currently, the kernel doesn't
> know about this, and respecting it fixes some PCI failures when the
> hypervisor is busy.
>
> The delay is capped at 0.2 seconds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> index ac3ffd9..c5603185 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh_pseries.c
> @@ -614,30 +614,61 @@ static int pseries_eeh_get_log(struct eeh_pe *pe, int severity, char *drv_log, u
> static int pseries_eeh_configure_bridge(struct eeh_pe *pe)
> {
> int config_addr;
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -1;
If possible it's preferable not to pre-initialise your return value.
If you leave it uninitialised then the compiler can (hopefully) detect any
paths where you fail to initialise it.
> + /* Waiting 0.2s maximum before skipping configuration */
> + int max_wait = 200;
> + int mwait;
>
> /* Figure out the PE address */
> config_addr = pe->config_addr;
> if (pe->addr)
> config_addr = pe->addr;
>
> - /* Use new configure-pe function, if supported */
> - if (ibm_configure_pe != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> - ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> - config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> - BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> - } else if (ibm_configure_bridge != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> - ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_bridge, 3, 1, NULL,
> - config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> - BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> - } else {
> - return -EFAULT;
> - }
> + while (1) {
> + if (max_wait < 0)
> + goto err;
Can't you just do:
while (max_wait > 0) {
?
> +
> + /* Use new configure-pe function, if supported */
> + if (ibm_configure_pe != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> + ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_pe, 3, 1, NULL,
> + config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> + BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> + } else if (ibm_configure_bridge != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) {
> + ret = rtas_call(ibm_configure_bridge, 3, 1, NULL,
> + config_addr, BUID_HI(pe->phb->buid),
> + BUID_LO(pe->phb->buid));
> + } else {
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
I realise you've just indented that code, but it would be nice to clean it up
as a precursor patch.
AFAICS the args are identical, so you could just put the token in a variable
and do the rtas_call() once. It also looks like we check at startup that we
have one of the tokens, so we could choose the appropriate token then and avoid
any conditinals in this code.
>
> - if (ret)
> - pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
> - __func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
> + /*
> + * If RTAS returns a delay value, it expects software to sleep
> + * for 10^x milliseconds. The max value it can return is thus
> + * 10^5 (RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX), which is way too long.
> + */
>
> + switch (ret) {
> + case 0:
> + return ret;
> + case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN:
> + mwait = 1;
> + break;
> + case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MAX:
> + mwait = 10;
> + break;
> + case RTAS_EXTENDED_DELAY_MIN+2:
> + mwait = 100;
> + break;
> + default:
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + max_wait -= mwait;
> + msleep(mwait);
Can you use rtas_busy_delay() ?
> + }
> + err:
> + pr_warn("%s: Unable to configure bridge PHB#%d-PE#%x (%d)\n",
> + __func__, pe->phb->global_number, pe->addr, ret);
> return ret;
> }
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-23 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-22 0:34 [PATCH] pseries/eeh: Handle RTAS delay requests in configure_bridge Russell Currey
2016-03-23 0:28 ` Russell Currey
2016-03-23 0:38 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2016-03-23 2:52 ` Russell Currey
2016-03-23 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-03-23 23:56 ` Russell Currey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3qV9fR1t3Bz9sDb@ozlabs.org \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ruscur@russell.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).