From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qrKbg5x8FzDqdX for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:39:11 +1000 (AEST) In-Reply-To: <20160407215914.8404.10459.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com> To: Hari Bathini , linuxppc-dev From: Michael Ellerman Cc: Michael Neuling , Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [v4,3/3] ppc64/book3s: remove __end_handlers marker Message-Id: <3qrKbf5S85z9t5c@ozlabs.org> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 23:39:10 +1000 (AEST) List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2016-07-04 at 22:00:34 UTC, Hari Bathini wrote: > __end_handlers marker was intended to mark down upto code that gets > called from exception prologs. But that hasn't kept pace with code > changes. Case in point, slb_miss_realmode being called from exception > prolog code but isn't below __end_handlers marker. So, __end_handlers > marker is as good as a comment but could be misleading at times if > it isn't in sync with the code, as is the case now. So, let us avoid > this confusion by having a better comment and removing __end_handlers > marker altogether. > > Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini Applied to powerpc next, thanks. https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/057b6d7e62ea4e6b1809e29469 cheers