linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/fadump: reserve memory at an offset closer to bottom of RAM
@ 2017-03-16 21:05 Hari Bathini
  2017-03-16 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/fadump: update fadump documentation Hari Bathini
  2017-04-03 10:13 ` [v2, 1/2] powerpc/fadump: reserve memory at an offset closer to bottom of RAM Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hari Bathini @ 2017-03-16 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mahesh J Salgaonkar, linuxppc-dev, Michael Ellerman

Currently, the area to preserve boot memory is reserved at the top of
RAM. This leaves fadump vulnerable to memory hot-remove operations. As
memory for fadump has to be reserved early in the boot process, fadump
can't be registered after a memory hot-remove operation. Though this
problem can't be eleminated completely, the impact can be minimized by
reserving memory at an offset closer to bottom of the RAM. The offset
for fadump memory reservation can be any value greater than fadump boot
memory size.

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

Changes from v1:
* Finding the offset based on memory holes/availability
* Improved error checking


 arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
index 8ff0dd4..33b2da3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c
@@ -319,15 +319,34 @@ int __init fadump_reserve_mem(void)
 		pr_debug("fadumphdr_addr = %p\n",
 				(void *) fw_dump.fadumphdr_addr);
 	} else {
-		/* Reserve the memory at the top of memory. */
 		size = get_fadump_area_size();
-		base = memory_boundary - size;
-		memblock_reserve(base, size);
-		printk(KERN_INFO "Reserved %ldMB of memory at %ldMB "
-				"for firmware-assisted dump\n",
-				(unsigned long)(size >> 20),
-				(unsigned long)(base >> 20));
+
+		/*
+		 * Reserve memory at an offset closer to bottom of the RAM to
+		 * minimize the impact of memory hot-remove operation. We can't
+		 * use memblock_find_in_range() here since it doesn't allocate
+		 * from bottom to top.
+		 */
+		for (base = fw_dump.boot_memory_size;
+		     base <= (memory_boundary - size);
+		     base += size) {
+			if (memblock_is_region_memory(base, size) &&
+			    !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
+				break;
+		}
+		if ((base > (memory_boundary - size)) ||
+		    memblock_reserve(base, size)) {
+			pr_err("Failed to reserve memory\n");
+			return 0;
+		}
+
+		pr_info("Reserved %ldMB of memory at %ldMB for firmware-"
+			"assisted dump (System RAM: %ldMB)\n",
+			(unsigned long)(size >> 20),
+			(unsigned long)(base >> 20),
+			(unsigned long)(memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20));
 	}
+
 	fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_start = base;
 	fw_dump.reserve_dump_area_size = size;
 	return 1;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-03 10:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-16 21:05 [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/fadump: reserve memory at an offset closer to bottom of RAM Hari Bathini
2017-03-16 21:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/fadump: update fadump documentation Hari Bathini
2017-04-03 10:13 ` [v2, 1/2] powerpc/fadump: reserve memory at an offset closer to bottom of RAM Michael Ellerman

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).