From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [V3] powerpc/mm/hash64: memset the pagetable pages on allocation.
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:43:50 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3zh7cl4ZvNz9t6j@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180213110933.5491-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 11:09:33 UTC, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
> On powerpc we allocate page table pages from slab cache of different sizes. For
> now we have a constructor that zero out the objects when we allocate then for
> the first time. We expect the objects to be zeroed out when we free the the
> object back to slab cache. This happens in the unmap path. For hugetlb pages
> we call huge_pte_get_and_clear to do that. With the current configuration of
> page table size, both pud and pgd level tables get allocated from the same slab
> cache. At the pud level, we use the second half of the table to store the slot
> information. But never clear that when unmapping. When such an freed object get
> allocated at pgd level, we will have part of the page table page not initlaized
> correctly. This result in kernel crash
>
> Simplify this by calling the object initialization after kmem_cache_alloc
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/fc5c2f4a55a2c258e12013cdf287cf
cheers
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-14 5:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-13 11:09 [PATCH V3] powerpc/mm/hash64: memset the pagetable pages on allocation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2018-02-13 19:51 ` Ram Pai
2018-02-14 5:43 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3zh7cl4ZvNz9t6j@ozlabs.org \
--to=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).