linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerry Van Baren <vanbaren_gerald@si.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 60 second CPU load spike
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 14:14:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.20010206140052.00baff00@falcon.si.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200102061833.f16IXbT21311@lara.pathlink.com>


Did you check the file system synchronizing?  Traditionally, it happens
every 30 seconds, but it may be 60 seconds in your system.  Even if you
are running on a RAM disk, the system quite likely is doing a bdflush()
periodically.

man update(8), bdflush(2)

gvb


At 10:33 AM 2/6/01 -0800, bkuschak@yahoo.com wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I was hoping someone might be able to provide a few hints or insights
>regarding
>a problem I am trying to track down.  I've noticed that something in
>our system
>is spiking the CPU load exactly every 60 seconds.  When the system is
>heavily
>loaded by packet processing, this spike causes the CPU to go to about
>100% (from
>80%) for approximately 2-3 seconds.  This causes packet drops at
>either the
>hardware or the netif_rx() backlog queue.  Here is some more information:
>
>- no other processes running except init, getty, sh, kswapd, kupdate,
>kflushd,
>wdt (watchdog)
>- kernel instrumentation shows one 60-second timer (wdt), but it is not
>coincident with the spike
>- happens with ethernet IP-forwarding
>- profiling data inconclusive
>- using MontaVista's 2.4 kernel on PowerPC405
>
>I noticed 60 second periodic tasks such as route-related garbage
>collection,
>etc, and changed these periods in /proc, without any effect.  I would
>like to
>find out what is causing these spikes and eliminate the problem.  Any
>comments
>would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>Brian


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-06 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-06 18:33 60 second CPU load spike bkuschak
2001-02-06 19:14 ` Jerry Van Baren [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-06 19:35 Brian Kuschak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4.3.2.20010206140052.00baff00@falcon.si.com \
    --to=vanbaren_gerald@si.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).