linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: uncached user space mapping with mmap() ???
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:18:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <404837D3.3060609@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40473464.8010203@imc-berlin.de>


Hi there,

thanks very much for all your help.
I used the stuff Stéphane suggested. But I have to ask again about
mapping of huge memory areas:

Let's say the peripheral has 32 MB address range staring at BASE. At
address GRAM 1MB of external SDRAM is located.

I use a simple test loop

	p = (unsigned short *)
		ioremap(base + GRAM, 32MB);

	START ();
	while (Retries--) {
		for (i = 0; i < Size; i++) {
			pData[i] = *p;
		}
	}
	STOP ();

When I map only the the GRAM I get a throughput of

IoremapTest...        8.0 s      => 2049.4 kW/s

But when I map the whole address range

	p = (unsigned short *)
		ioremap(BASE, imcdevif_iosize);

and move the pointer

	p += GRAM;

before entering the test loop I only get

IoremapTest...        8.4 s      => 1944.8 kW/s

How is that???

Is it always better to map only the small part I am going to use?

Thanks a million!

--
Steven Scholz

imc Measurement & Control               imc Meßsysteme GmbH
Voltastr. 5                             Voltastr. 5
13355 Berlin                            13355 Berlin
Germany                                 Deutschland


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-05  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-04 13:51 uncached user space mapping with mmap() ??? Steven Scholz
2004-03-04 17:00 ` Dan Malek
2004-03-05  8:18 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2004-03-05 11:35   ` Jon Masters
2004-03-05 11:41     ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-05 13:21       ` Jon Masters
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-04 14:15 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-04 14:35 ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-04 17:28   ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-03-04 14:47 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-04 14:51 ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-04 23:02 Richard Williams
2004-03-04 23:17 ` Dan Malek
2004-03-08 10:25 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-09 10:55 ` Jon Masters
2004-03-09 12:49 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-12 12:07 ` Jon Masters

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=404837D3.3060609@imc-berlin.de \
    --to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).