linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: uncached user space mapping with mmap() ???
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 12:41:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40486783.7010703@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40486600.9090304@jonmasters.org>


Jon Masters wrote:

> | Is it always better to map only the small part I am going to use?
>
> Of course it is always best to map only the small range that you are
> going to use and there will not necessarily be only one TLB mapping (I
> am here referring to your comments on ARM Linux Kernel List) etc. etc.
> However here especially I am inclined to repeat what they said on the
> other list - these figures are so close that they might differ for other
> reasons and so on. Did you repeat this in a controlled way many times?

Yes. The thruput is calculated after repeating the loop 1000 times
(Retries = 1000).

> You will need to answer the questions Russell King posted in order for
> us to work through this and figure out where the difference lies.
I am just about to do it.


--
Steven Scholz

imc Measurement & Control               imc Meßsysteme GmbH
Voltastr. 5                             Voltastr. 5
13355 Berlin                            13355 Berlin
Germany                                 Deutschland


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-05 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-04 13:51 uncached user space mapping with mmap() ??? Steven Scholz
2004-03-04 17:00 ` Dan Malek
2004-03-05  8:18 ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-05 11:35   ` Jon Masters
2004-03-05 11:41     ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2004-03-05 13:21       ` Jon Masters
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-04 14:15 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-04 14:35 ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-04 17:28   ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-03-04 14:47 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-04 14:51 ` Steven Scholz
2004-03-04 23:02 Richard Williams
2004-03-04 23:17 ` Dan Malek
2004-03-08 10:25 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-09 10:55 ` Jon Masters
2004-03-09 12:49 Fillod Stephane
2004-03-12 12:07 ` Jon Masters

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40486783.7010703@imc-berlin.de \
    --to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).