From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <404F421B.2000602@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:28:11 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ing.Gianfranco Morandi (LAN)" Cc: LinuxPPC Subject: Re: Marvell DB64360 References: <010201c40692$51da2820$0400a8c0@portatile> In-Reply-To: <010201c40692$51da2820$0400a8c0@portatile> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Ing.Gianfranco Morandi (LAN) wrote: >I'm evaluating a new development based on PPC750FX and I would like to check >if there is some porting on the ELDK 3.0 package. > I'll defer to Wolfgang on this one. >I have also verified what development board could be the best candidate to >be used as starting point and It seems to be the Marvell DB64360. > >Did anybody work on such board? > >and > >Could anybody suggest me if there is some better reference point? > > There are several emails regarding this in the archives but basically, right now the linux_2_4_galileo tree on source.mvista.com is the only tree that I know of with 64360 support publicly available. Note that this is an old, dead tree. I'm currently working on a merged pkg (64260/360/460) for the 2.6 tree but its not ready. I don't know if it will be worth back porting to 2.4 b/c that tree is pretty much locked down. Mark ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/