linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Hatle <mhatle@mvista.com>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@conformative.com>
Cc: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: version of gcc
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:51:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4050D15F.1070308@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03e401c407a5$2bd19410$3000a8c0@foundation>


My advice is to always use the gcc that your vendor recommends.  If you
do not have a vendor, find one and see what they recommend.. <grin>  The
easiest vendor to see is the ELDK.

Note, thos recommendations in the Documentation file are generally
specific to x86.  PPC the newer gcc compilers are sometimes required for
different architectures.

--Mark

Stuart Yoder wrote:
> The 2.4 kernel Documentation/Changes file has the following note:
>
> The recommended compiler for the kernel is gcc 2.95.x (x >= 3), and it
> should be used when you need absolute stability. You may use gcc 3.0.x
> instead if you wish, although it may cause problems. Later versions of gcc
> have not received much testing for Linux kernel compilation, and there are
> almost certainly bugs (mainly, but not exclusively, in the kernel) that
> will need to be fixed in order to use these compilers.
>
> Is this still true?  The comment appears to be > 2 years old.  I am running
> gcc 3.2.2 and wondering if I'm asking for trouble.   Do I really need to
> revert back to an old compiler?
>
> Thanks,
> Stuart
>
>
>
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

      reply	other threads:[~2004-03-11 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-11 20:12 version of gcc Stuart Yoder
2004-03-11 20:51 ` Mark Hatle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4050D15F.1070308@mvista.com \
    --to=mhatle@mvista.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=stuart.yoder@conformative.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).