From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <406B5C7F.6050408@embeddededge.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:04:15 -0500 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: John Whitney , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Proposed Kconfig update patch for help text References: <20040331230620.ACC3BC10A4@atlas.denx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message you wrote: > >> types (601, 603, 604, 740, 750, 7400), the Motorola embedded >>- versions (821, 823, 850, 855, 860, 8260), the IBM embedded >>versions >>+ versions (821, 823, 850, 855, 860, 82xx), the IBM embedded > > > How about types like 857, 862, the 866 family, the 885 family, ... ? Well, the 821 should be canned, but I think all we differentiate is 823/850 and "others", don't we? The rest of the configuration is determined by your I/O choices, which I personally like so we don't have config files littered with all of the different CPM and peripheral variations. In fact, I think we currently just ask for alternate SMC1 pin mapping, so we don't even need to specifically know 823/850. Thanks. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/