From: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] SB600 for the Nemo board has non-zero devices on non-root bus
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 23:08:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <406ba7c4-7305-4069-227f-81afed202e47@xenosoft.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130224243.GB19640@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1666 bytes --]
On 30.11.2017 23:42, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> 00:11.0 claims to be a PCIe Root Port leading to [bus 05-06]. That
> means there's a Link (presumably this A-Link II Express thing), and the
> downstream end of the Link *should* be a PCIe Upstream Port on bus 05,
> but no such device is visible. I suppose the SB600 does implement
> some sort of PCIe Port there, but keeps it invisible to software, and
> at the same time, contains an invisible bridge that connects the Link
> to all the conventional PCI devices on bus 05.
>
> When we scan bus 05, we do this:
>
> pci_scan_child_bus_extend(bus=05)
> for (devfn = 0; devfn < 0x100; devfn += 8)
> pci_scan_slot(05, 00.0)
> pci_scan_single_device
> pci_scan_device(05, 00.0) # fails; no 05:00.0
> pci_scan_slot(05, 01.0)
> only_one_child(bus=05)
> parent = 00:11.0
> pci_pcie_type(00:11.0) == ROOT_PORT # returns true
>
> Since only_one_child() sees that 00:11.0 is a Root Port, we give up
> before we even get to the PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS test.
>
> I *think* something like the patch below should make this work if you
> use the "pci=pcie_scan_all" parameter. We have some x86 DMI quirks
> that set PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS automatically. I don't know how to do
> something similar on powerpc, but maybe you do?
>
Hi Bjorn,
I tested your new patch today. It boots with the boot argument
"pci=pcie_scan_all". Well done! :-)
It doesn't boot without the boot argument "pci=pcie_scan_all".
Many thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Christian
[-- Attachment #2: probe.c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1952 bytes --]
commit 75eaf674066590e79b3e03d32488871fc881ab40
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date: Thu Nov 30 15:22:39 2017 -0600
PCI: Make PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS work for Root Ports as well as Downstream
Previously PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS (set by quirks or the "pci=pcie_scan_all"
kernel parameter) only affected Switch Downstream Ports, not Root Ports.
Simplify and restructure only_one_child() so PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS means
we scan for all possible devices below Root Ports as well as Switch
Downstream Ports.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index 14e0ea1ff38b..9e57d4ef0c1f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -2217,20 +2217,28 @@ static int only_one_child(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
struct pci_dev *parent = bus->self;
- if (!parent || !pci_is_pcie(parent))
+ if (!parent)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Systems with unusual topologies set PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS so
+ * we scan for all possible devices, not just Device 0.
+ */
+ if (pci_has_flag(PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS))
return 0;
- if (pci_pcie_type(parent) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
- return 1;
/*
- * PCIe downstream ports are bridges that normally lead to only a
- * device 0, but if PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS is set, scan all
- * possible devices, not just device 0. See PCIe spec r3.0,
- * sec 7.3.1.
+ * A PCIe Downstream Port normally leads to a Link with only Device
+ * 0 on it (PCIe spec r3.1, sec 7.3.1). As an optimization, scan
+ * only for Device 0 in that situation.
+ *
+ * Checking has_secondary_link is a hack to identify Downstream
+ * Ports because sometimes Switches are configured such that the
+ * PCIe Port Type labels are backwards.
*/
- if (parent->has_secondary_link &&
- !pci_has_flag(PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS))
+ if (pci_is_pcie(parent) && parent->has_secondary_link)
return 1;
+
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 7:47 [PATCH] SB600 for the Nemo board has non-zero devices on non-root bus Christian Zigotzky
2017-11-23 13:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-29 19:28 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-11-29 19:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-11-29 20:45 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-11-29 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-11-29 23:39 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-11-30 22:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-01 22:08 ` Christian Zigotzky [this message]
2017-12-01 23:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-02 12:54 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-02 23:00 ` Olof Johansson
2017-12-02 23:02 ` Olof Johansson
2017-12-03 9:43 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-06 8:37 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-06 11:03 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-06 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-06 21:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-08 11:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-09 18:03 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-15 8:04 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-15 20:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-16 7:18 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-22 9:57 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-22 10:22 ` Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-22 11:19 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-22 12:11 ` Christian Zigotzky
2018-06-04 14:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-12-06 12:44 ` [PATCH] " Michael Ellerman
2017-12-06 15:53 ` Olof Johansson
2017-12-08 11:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-03-16 12:10 ` [PATCH 0/1] PCI set flag PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS for P.A. Semi boards Christian Zigotzky
2018-03-16 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Christian Zigotzky
2018-03-19 19:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-19 20:46 ` Christian Zigotzky
2018-03-19 22:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2018-03-21 6:44 ` Christian Zigotzky
2018-03-25 20:55 ` Darren Stevens
2018-04-16 4:29 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Christian Zigotzky
2017-12-04 11:40 ` SB600 for the Nemo board has non-zero devices on non-root bus Darren Stevens
2017-12-04 13:31 ` Christian Zigotzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=406ba7c4-7305-4069-227f-81afed202e47@xenosoft.de \
--to=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).