From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40843D73.9090500@lucent.com> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 14:58:27 -0600 From: Mike Wellington MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Ryser Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: PCI - i *thought* the edk2 was what I was using! References: <1b6001c417f6$229c2a70$3cc8a8c0@epro.dom> <40842D14.9040708@lucent.com> <40843B02.6080907@xilinx.com> In-Reply-To: <40843B02.6080907@xilinx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Peter - I thought that the edk2 example from the link you gave me was the pcore I was using. I will start over from scratch and try again. My machine is busy doing some big downloads/backups so it will be tonite/tomorrow before I can verify and report back. Peter Ryser wrote: > The PCI support that is currently included in the Linux kernel tree is > for the V2PDK based OPB -> PCI bridge. It will not work with the EDK > based OPB -> PCI bridge, i.e. you will find exactly what you see. > > Please download the EDK reference design for ML300 from > http://www.xilinx.com/ise/embedded/edk_examples.htm (design #6). The > design contains the V2PDK based bridge (including the pcore therefor) > and, thus, the Linux kernel will work fine with that design. > > We are currently working on moving to the EDK based bridge and the Linux > kernel tree will be patched once this work is completed. > > - Peter > > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/