From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:05:05 -0700 From: Peter Ryser Subject: Re: PCI - i *thought* the edk2 was what I was using! In-reply-to: <40843D73.9090500@lucent.com> To: Mike Wellington Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Message-id: <40844D11.7080900@xilinx.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed References: <1b6001c417f6$229c2a70$3cc8a8c0@epro.dom> <40842D14.9040708@lucent.com> <40843B02.6080907@xilinx.com> <40843D73.9090500@lucent.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Mike, the ml300_edk2.zip design does not have PCI at all. Only the ml300_edk3.zip, i.e. the design to which the link currently points has the pcore that works with Linux. - Peter Mike Wellington wrote: > Peter - I thought that the edk2 example from the link > you gave me was the pcore I was using. I will start > over from scratch and try again. > > My machine is busy doing some big downloads/backups > so it will be tonite/tomorrow before I can verify > and report back. > > > > > > Peter Ryser wrote: > >> The PCI support that is currently included in the Linux kernel tree >> is for the V2PDK based OPB -> PCI bridge. It will not work with the >> EDK based OPB -> PCI bridge, i.e. you will find exactly what you see. >> >> Please download the EDK reference design for ML300 from >> http://www.xilinx.com/ise/embedded/edk_examples.htm (design #6). The >> design contains the V2PDK based bridge (including the pcore therefor) >> and, thus, the Linux kernel will work fine with that design. >> >> We are currently working on moving to the EDK based bridge and the >> Linux kernel tree will be patched once this work is completed. >> >> - Peter >> >> > ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/