From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.216]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 737B1679E2 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:01:12 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200603140850.47014.david.jander@protonic.nl> References: <20060310153341.080163525CB@atlas.denx.de> <200603140850.47014.david.jander@protonic.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <409257f58f9dab82d72ccd997516f772@embeddedalley.com> From: Dan Malek Subject: Re: Stable Linux kernel 2.6 for MPC8XX Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:01:37 -0500 To: David Jander Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mar 14, 2006, at 2:50 AM, David Jander wrote: > I don't know why, but while everyone still says 2.6 is slower, I am > consistently getting results that seem to prove the opposite. Why? Because this is a compiler test and not an OS test. The newer ELDK with 2.6 has better compilers. -- Dan