linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Braiden <lee_b@member.fsf.org>
To: "debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org" <debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: SMP kernels on single processor machines
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 13:30:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ADF663.1060100@member.fsf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1085097417.9801.5.camel@gaston>


Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Yah, well... CONFIG_PREEMPT gives you all the problems of SMP without
> any benefit so .... :)

Well, I know people argue about that, but I think it was you who advised
me to avoid PREEMPT before, so I'll take your word for it.

But... what you said above was exactly my point.  There are no benefits
for single-cpu machines running an SMP kernel, right?  So it would
introduce more complexity for no gain.  Moreover, I think(?) the
majority of ppc machines are non-smp, so it would also be a shift to a
more obscure and (even) less well-tested config.

--
Lee Braiden
lee_b@member.fsf.org


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-21 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-20 10:58 SMP kernels on single processor machines Jens Schmalzing
2004-05-20 11:48 ` Lee Braiden
2004-05-20 23:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-21 10:34     ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-05-21 11:11       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-05-21 12:30     ` Lee Braiden [this message]
2004-05-21 12:58       ` Marius Groeger
2004-05-21 23:11         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40ADF663.1060100@member.fsf.org \
    --to=lee_b@member.fsf.org \
    --cc=debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).