From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40DD8710.8030100@pacbell.net> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 07:24:16 -0700 From: David Brownell MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse , Bertrand Baudet Cc: Greg KH , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: RE : MPC5200Lite PCI & IRQ References: <5A96167EBCEA8440A48790B5419953AE13C46A@gr-lafayette.lacie.com> <1087554029.19489.3149.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <20040619000118.GB24902@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20040619000118.GB24902@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:20:30AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >>On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 12:06 +0200, Bertrand Baudet wrote: >>>There are probably other drivers that have the wrong assumption that IRQ 0 >>>is an unassigned IRQ. Is there a designated "no IRQ assigned" code? There should be one ... that's why such code gets cut/pasted. Unless pci_enable_device() is (now) guaranteed to fail if the device has no IRQ assignment? Possibly that test should vanish, it was evidently a problem for a while but I've not heard reports of such problems lately. It's in 2.6 because of cut/paste from 2.4 code. Feel free to post a patch. - Dave ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/