linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Simoens <stefaan.simoens@coditel.net>
To: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 03:30:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40E75DC7.7070601@coditel.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040703222918.GA10425@suse.de>


Olaf Hering wrote:

>  On Tue, Jun 15, Tom Rini wrote:
>
>
>>And yes, passing -many does work on all older supported versions of
>>binutils.  So perhaps we should just add -Wa,-many to our cflags and be
>>done with it now (and for future fixes of this sort).
>
>
> gcc 3.2 passes only -mppc, so all altive instructions will fail to
> compile without either -many or -maltivec

Are there altivec instructions when CONFIG_ALTIVEC is not set?

> diff -purNX /suse/olh/kernel/kernel_exclude.txt linux-2.6.7-bk16.orig/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile linux-2.6.7-bk16/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile
> --- linux-2.6.7-bk16.orig/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile	2004-07-03 22:33:35.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7-bk16/arch/ppc/kernel/Makefile	2004-07-03 22:51:16.802332774 +0200
> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ endif
>  ifdef CONFIG_4xx
>  EXTRA_AFLAGS		:= -Wa,-m405
>  endif
> +ifdef CONFIG_6xx
> +EXTRA_AFLAGS		:= -Wa,-maltivec
> +endif
>  ifdef CONFIG_E500
>  EXTRA_AFLAGS		:= -Wa,-me500
>  endif

So, shouldn't this be "ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC" ?

Stef


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-04  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-05  7:43 [PATCH] fix typo in binutils version check Olaf Hering
2004-06-05 10:40 ` Christian Kujau
2004-06-05 11:11   ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-05 13:11     ` Christian Kujau
2004-06-07 15:57     ` Tom Rini
2004-06-08 11:25 ` [PATCH] fix missing option " Olaf Hering
2004-06-10  0:16   ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14  9:15     ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 16:23       ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 17:38         ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 18:07           ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-14 20:55             ` Tom Rini
2004-06-14 21:19               ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-15 16:12                 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 17:25                   ` Olaf Hering
2004-06-15 17:46                     ` Tom Rini
2004-07-03 22:29                       ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-04  1:30                         ` Stef Simoens [this message]
2004-07-04  2:41                           ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04  8:32                             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-04 16:33                               ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-07-25  6:07                                 ` Alan Modra
2004-07-26 19:36                                   ` Tom Rini
2004-07-26 23:03                                     ` Alan Modra
2004-07-26 23:07                                       ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04 18:32                               ` Tom Rini
2004-07-04  7:23                         ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-05 18:32                           ` Tom Rini
2004-07-09  1:34                             ` Tom Rini
2004-07-09  1:43                               ` Tom Rini
2004-07-12  9:06                               ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-12 15:11                                 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-12 18:03                                   ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 13:49                                     ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 14:01                                       ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 14:02                                         ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 14:20                                           ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 15:18                                             ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 15:26                                               ` Tom Rini
2004-07-13 15:29                                                 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 19:45                                                   ` Tom Rini
2004-07-14 23:23                                                   ` Tom Rini
2004-07-15  7:54                                                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-07-15 12:50                                                     ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-15 14:15                                                       ` Tom Rini
2004-07-15 14:24                                                         ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-15 14:23                                                       ` Tom Rini
2004-07-05 18:18                         ` Tom Rini
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-10 16:19 Christian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40E75DC7.7070601@coditel.net \
    --to=stefaan.simoens@coditel.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=olh@suse.de \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).