From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com, clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com, vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [v2] cxl: Fix possible deadlock when processing page faults from cxllib
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 00:39:54 +1000 (AEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40GTBf4GFWz9ryr@ozlabs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403135402.30374-1-fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 13:54:02 UTC, Frederic Barrat wrote:
> cxllib_handle_fault() is called by an external driver when it needs to
> have the host resolve page faults for a buffer. The buffer can cover
> several pages and VMAs. The function iterates over all the pages used
> by the buffer, based on the page size of the VMA.
>
> To ensure some stability while processing the faults, the thread T1
> grabs the mm->mmap_sem semaphore with read access (R1). However, when
> processing a page fault for a single page, one of the underlying
> functions, copro_handle_mm_fault(), also grabs the same semaphore with
> read access (R2). So the thread T1 takes the semaphore twice.
>
> If another thread T2 tries to access the semaphore in write mode W1
> (say, because it wants to allocate memory and calls 'brk'), then that
> thread T2 will have to wait because there's a reader (R1). If the
> thread T1 is processing a new page at that time, it won't get an
> automatic grant at R2, because there's now a writer thread
> waiting (T2). And we have a deadlock.
>
> The timeline is:
> 1. thread T1 owns the semaphore with read access R1
> 2. thread T2 requests write access W1 and waits
> 3. thread T1 requests read access R2 and waits
>
> The fix is for the thread T1 to release the semaphore R1 once it got
> the information it needs from the current VMA. The address space/VMAs
> could evolve while T1 iterates over the full buffer, but in the
> unlikely case where T1 misses a page, the external driver will raise a
> new page fault when retrying the memory access.
>
> Fixes: 3ced8d730063 ("cxl: Export library to support IBM XSL")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.13+
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Applied to powerpc next, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/ad7b4e8022b9864c075fe71e1328b1
cheers
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-04 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 13:54 [PATCH v2] cxl: Fix possible deadlock when processing page faults from cxllib Frederic Barrat
2018-04-03 14:06 ` Laurent Dufour
2018-04-03 14:15 ` Frederic Barrat
2018-04-04 14:39 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40GTBf4GFWz9ryr@ozlabs.org \
--to=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).