From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.mailbox.co.uk (smtp.mailbox.co.uk [195.82.125.32]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2192BC0F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:15:14 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <415D3C2C.7050704@jonmasters.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:14:52 +0100 From: Jon Masters MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt References: <35fb2e59040930165327f2dd59@mail.gmail.com> <87127382-1357-11D9-8EFC-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> <1096602008.14803.16.camel@gaston> In-Reply-To: <1096602008.14803.16.camel@gaston> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: bi_recs List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 13:11, Kumar Gala wrote: >>I've been told that ARM has a solution, in place, to this problem that >>might always be worth looking at. I asked on their mailing list a while ago in preparation but I think Ben has the best approach. > I'd rather see you guys sync with what I did on ppc64 and use that > kind of OF device-tree, we already have all the code for using it > and it would make the mecanism compatible with the prep/chrp/pmac > kernel... Yeah. I'm going to start ripping through your code at the weekend and figure out how what you've done - not having a nice shiney ppc64 box means I've not yet got an excuse to play with that tree myself. I am however hopefull that my next Powerbook will be a G5 :-). > But that's just a suggestion... Taken. Jon.