From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailhub-node1.mailbox.net.uk (mailhub-node1.mailbox.net.uk [195.82.125.30]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA48D2BD6A for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 01:07:11 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <41616707.6070901@jonmasters.org> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 16:06:47 +0100 From: Jon Masters MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Porter References: <35fb2e59040930165327f2dd59@mail.gmail.com> <87127382-1357-11D9-8EFC-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> <20041001220648.GJ21896@smtp.west.cox.net> <4160E898.9080905@intracom.gr> <20041004142909.GA27376@smtp.west.cox.net> <20041004074105.A11487@home.com> In-Reply-To: <20041004074105.A11487@home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: bi_recs List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matt Porter wrote: > Same here, I see that no one has raised a technical issue with the > flattened device tree method. Since it is a working mechanism AND it > unifies the arch, it's the clear choice over reinventing the wheel. > All we need is an implementation. Well don't go writing it as I'll get there sometime soon - just need chance to fit it in with worky stuff this week. If you don't see a patch from me by the weekend then you're welcome to hit me with large pointy sticks at next OLS. Jon.