From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC1492BDF2 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 01:06:57 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <418A35ED.3090400@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:00:13 +0100 From: evilninja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev References: <4189888E.5070906@vision.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <4189888E.5070906@vision.caltech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: problem with insmod List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Arrigo Benedetti schrieb: > After some research I found that to load a module on the 2.6 kernel one yes, http://www.linux.org.uk/~davej/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt is a good start for 2.4 -> 2.6 upgrades. > So I compile and install module-init-tools, but I get the same error. > Does anyone know what's going on? hm, are you sure the new "insmod" and "modprobe" are the *right* ones? the PATH variable will help here or try to specify the exact path on the cmd line. here i have: evil@prinz:~$ /sbin/modprobe -V module-init-tools version 3.1-pre6 vil@prinz:~$ file /sbin/modprobe* /sbin/modprobe: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, [...] /sbin/modprobe.Lmodutils: symbolic link to `insmod' /sbin/modprobe.modutils: symbolic link to `insmod.modutils' Christian. - -- BOFH excuse #391: We already sent around a notice about that. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBijXsC/PVm5+NVoYRAkspAJ9v5khRZVwpPxsmTL/v5tYKUUkrDgCg2np7 85mBGkq+rCRLwO7DJMNjoQA= =xfHv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----