linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [FYI] linux 2.6 still not working with PReP (ppc32)
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 23:45:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B23DF2.4010303@g-house.de> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

hi,

upon receiving some calls about the status on this issue, i decided to
update http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1494 , which i reported a
while back. yes, this is "just a PReP" and i am fully aware that PReP is
not used in recent setups any more and i too will not my PReP for HPC
applications. but perhaps someone has an idea about what's goin on here.

the bugreport should give you th full details, in short: linux 2.5.30 is
the last working kernel for ppc32/PReP with networking enabled.
(net)booting a recent 2.6 kernels spit out lots of these:

(with tulip NIC)
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 irq 9: nobody cared!
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 Call trace:
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c002e99c] __report_bad_irq+0x34/0xac
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c002eb00] note_interrupt+0xd0/0x104
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c002e480] __do_IRQ+0x174/0x184
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c00053e0] do_IRQ+0x38/0x98
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c00044cc] ret_from_except+0x0/0x14
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c002e748] setup_irq+0xd8/0x138
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c002e938] request_irq+0x90/0xc0
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c0103504] tulip_open+0x30/0xb6c
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c0117274] dev_open+0xb0/0xd8
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c0118a7c] dev_change_flags+0x6c/0x144
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c0123db4] netpoll_setup+0x1c4/0x364
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c0106fe0] init_netconsole+0x3c/0x94
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c0003a64] init+0xb8/0x230
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [c0006524] kernel_thread+0x44/0x60
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 handlers:
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 [<c010101c>] (tulip_interrupt+0x0/0xd3c)
Dec  3 23:56:39 192.168.10.9 Disabling IRQ #9

(with 3c59x NIC)
192.168.10.9 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
192.168.10.9 eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status e800.
192.168.10.9 diagnostics: net 0cc0 media 8802 dma 002000b3 fifo 0000
192.168.10.9 eth0: Interrupt posted but not delivered -- IRQ blocked by
another device?
192.168.10.9 Flags; bus-master 1, dirty 67(3) current 68(4)
192.168.10.9 Transmit list 806fe480 vs. c06fe3e0.
192.168.10.9 0: @c06fe200  length 80000054 status 00000054
192.168.10.9 1: @c06fe2a0  length 8000005e status 0000005e
192.168.10.9 2: @c06fe340  length 80000064 status 00000064
192.168.10.9 3: @c06fe3e0  length 80000075 status 00000075
192.168.10.9 4: @c06fe480  length 8000005b status 0000005b
192.168.10.9 5: @c06fe520  length 80000051 status 00000051
192.168.10.9 6: @c06fe5c0  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 7: @c06fe660  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 8: @c06fe700  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 9: @c06fe7a0  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 10: @c06fe840  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 11: @c06fe8e0  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 12: @c06fe980  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 13: @c06fea20  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 14: @c06feac0  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 13: @c06fea20  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 14: @c06feac0  length 8000005a status 0000005a
192.168.10.9 15: @c06feb60  length 8000005a status 0000005a

is it possible to use another irq for the network-device driver?
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt gives some options about other
drivers, but i can't tell how to specify "use this irq" for tulip/3c59x.

especially the "IRQ blocked by another device?" message makes me think,
that manual irq config could help here. but maybe i'm wrong.

the results posted on http://nerdbynature.de/bits/sheep/2.6.10-rc2/ are
from current 2.6 kernels: the offical tree and the linuxppc25 tree was used.

thank you for comments,
Christian.
- --
BOFH excuse #441:

Hash table has woodworm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBsj3y+A7rjkF8z0wRAldLAJ9QFTfr8UeOtXbnSCGWBVJr7IAAKgCgiHRV
iB/ozetyCDIMSfAa+1MRxVc=
=b5BK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

             reply	other threads:[~2004-12-04 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-04 22:45 Christian Kujau [this message]
2004-12-05  0:41 ` [FYI] linux 2.6 still not working with PReP (ppc32) Sebastian Heutling
2004-12-05 17:41   ` Christian Kujau
2004-12-06  1:46     ` Sebastian Heutling
2004-12-06  4:15       ` [FYI] linux 2.6 still not^Wnow " Christian Kujau
2004-12-05 19:57   ` [PATCH] linux 2.6 " Christian Kujau
2004-12-06 18:49     ` Tom Rini
2004-12-06 19:33       ` Christian
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-26 13:35 [FYI] linux 2.6 still not " Marc Dietrich
2004-12-27  2:47 ` Christian
2004-12-27 21:37   ` Marc Dietrich
2005-01-02  0:31     ` Sebastian Heutling
2005-01-03 12:26       ` Marc Dietrich
2005-01-04  0:54         ` evilninja
2005-01-04 11:31         ` Sebastian Heutling
2005-01-04 14:04           ` Marc Dietrich
2005-01-04 14:42             ` Sebastian Heutling
     [not found]             ` <1104850036.6164.25.camel@weizen.left.earth>
2005-01-05 11:33               ` Marc Dietrich
2005-01-05 15:47                 ` Sven Luther
2005-01-05 17:10                   ` Christian
2005-01-05 17:39                     ` Sven Luther
2005-01-06 16:00                       ` Christian
2005-01-06 16:27                         ` Sven Luther
2005-01-06 20:27                           ` Christian
2005-01-06 21:07                             ` Sven Luther
2005-01-06 21:21                               ` Christian
2005-01-06 21:49                                 ` Sven Luther
2004-12-31  9:55   ` Sven Luther
2004-12-31 15:00     ` Sebastian Heutling
2004-12-31 22:28       ` Sven Luther
2005-01-01 23:56         ` Sebastian Heutling
2005-01-02  9:39           ` Sven Luther
2005-01-02 21:33             ` Sebastian Heutling
     [not found] ` <200501051733.06350.marvin24@gmx.de>
     [not found]   ` <20050105165551.GA29287@pegasos>
2005-01-05 20:57     ` Marc Dietrich
2005-01-09 23:17       ` Sebastian Heutling
2005-01-10  6:34         ` Sven Luther
2005-01-10 15:19           ` Sebastian Heutling
2005-01-10  6:54         ` Sven Luther
2005-01-04  2:12 Christian
2005-01-04 13:23 ` Marc Dietrich
2005-01-04 15:08   ` Christian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41B23DF2.4010303@g-house.de \
    --to=evil@g-house.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).