From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-09.arcor-online.net (mail-in-09.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B7167B16 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:12:08 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060619171943.7730@bebe.enoyolf.org> References: <20060619171943.7730@bebe.enoyolf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <41C6BB03-59B9-4954-815B-7750B0996AB9@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: OFW node names Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:11:55 +0200 To: Doug Maxey Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Does any platform known to use yaboot (or grub for that matter) use > the > preferred encoding of the manufacturer portion of the name property? > How about the "ONNNNN" OUI from the RAC, or the uppercase VWXYZ > company stock symbol? Apple sometimes uses AAPL. Never seen the ONNNNNN thing. > My view has been limited to the IBM platform. According to the > examples, this is a recommended practice. I know IBM uses the > lowercase variant. Which _is_ allowed, although discouraged. Segher