From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com (zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com [47.129.242.56]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52652BDB5 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:54:39 +1100 (EST) Received: from zcard303.ca.nortel.com (zcard303.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.59]) by zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id j03MsTT01654 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:54:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41D9CD19.50207@nortelnetworks.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:54:17 -0600 From: Chris Friesen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Subject: dcbz not used on ppc64? List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I ran into some issues with the use of the dcbz instruction in the kernel for ppc32. I'm now looking at porting our work to ppc64, and when I looked around a bit, I found that the dcbz instruction doesn't appear to be used in ppc64. This leads me to ask: 1) Is it in fact true that ppc64 does not use dcbz in the kernel? 2) If so, why not? Presumably it would be a win in some cases, otherwise they wouldn't be using it in ppc32. Is there some other factore in play for ppc64? Thanks, Chris