From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zebra.brightstareng.com (206.173.66.57.ptr.us.xo.net [206.173.66.57]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113D67A6D for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:53:25 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zebra.brightstareng.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5044628C22B for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:29:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from zebra.brightstareng.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zebra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22071-03 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:29:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from brightstareng.com (unknown [192.168.1.240]) by zebra.brightstareng.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B246528C1C2 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:29:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41F916ED.1070705@brightstareng.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:29:33 -0500 From: Stuart Adams MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Subject: MPC5200 bogomips List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , We are only seeing 263.78 bogomips on a MPC5200 running at 396 MHz. Doesn't this seem way to low ?? With a 603e core I'd expect 1 bogomip per MHz or better. The exact same kernel source running on an 8xx PPC gets about 1 bogomip per MHZ and my 745 CPU board does 2 bogomips per MHz ... the bogomip calibration code is the same for all PPC architectures so it seem like it should be an apples-to-apples comparison. -- Stuart