From: Robin Gilks <robin.gilks@tait.co.nz>
To: ppc embedded list <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: 8xx bus monitoring
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:15:45 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FD5C91.404@tait.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41F74169.9050006@intracom.gr>
Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Robin Gilks wrote:
>
>> Greetings
>>
>> System is a MPC859 based controller.
>>
>> I'm trying to determine whether a peripheral is not responding to
>> memory fetches by using the bus monitor feature on the Transfer
>> Acknowledge (TA) signal. This is set to the maximum count in the Bus
>> Monitor Timeout (BMT) in the System Protect Control Register (SYPCR).
>> The monitoring is enabled by setting the Bus Monitor Enable (BME) bit
>> in SYPCR as well.
>>
>> I understand that I can use the Transfer Error Status Register (TESR)
>> to read the fact that I have had a timeout by checking the Data
>> Transfer Monitor Timeout (DTMT) bit in this register.
>>
>> The problem is, how do I know any error has occured so I know to look
>> at the TESR. I can't see a way of generating an exception from this
>> condition.
>>
>> Any help appreciated.
>>
>
> You get a machine check exception.
>
> It's pretty obvious then :)
>
Using a 2.4.22 based kernel, as far as I can see a machine check should
be trapped (its only allowed to cause a reset in the reboot code I
think). Assuming I got it right and it really is trapped, how come I
always get a reset:-((
Any pointers to the code that does setup for causing an exception
(rather than reset) would be appreciated.
--
Robin Gilks
Senior Design Engineer Phone: (+64)(3) 357 1569
Tait Electronics Fax : (+64)(3) 359 4632
PO Box 1645 Christchurch Email : robin.gilks@tait.co.nz
New Zealand
=======================================================================
This email, including any attachments, is only for the intended
addressee. It is subject to copyright, is confidential and may be
the subject of legal or other privilege, none of which is waived or
lost by reason of this transmission.
If the receiver is not the intended addressee, please accept our
apologies, notify us by return, delete all copies and perform no
other act on the email.
Unfortunately, we cannot warrant that the email has not been
altered or corrupted during transmission.
=======================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-30 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-26 2:31 8xx bus monitoring Robin Gilks
2005-01-26 7:06 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-01-30 22:15 ` Robin Gilks [this message]
2005-01-31 7:09 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2005-01-31 21:49 ` Robin Gilks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FD5C91.404@tait.co.nz \
--to=robin.gilks@tait.co.nz \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).