From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mncltd.com (p15112080.pureserver.info [217.160.169.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783B267A46 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:37:35 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <420C6EC6.4020800@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:37:26 +0100 From: Andre' Draszik MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini References: <4206EFDC.3090904@gmx.net> <20050208223348.GA31592@smtp.west.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20050208223348.GA31592@smtp.west.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPC32] mktree fix List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 05:34:36AM +0100, Andre' Draszik wrote: > > >>This one fixes mktree. The image size stored in the header is pretty off >>without >>this patch. (yes, it can make a difference of upto almost 64k) >> >>Signed-off-by: Andre' Draszik > > > With this wrong, what breaks? Thanks. I don't think anything breaks but if somebody relies on the image size stored in the header, up to almost 64k bytes of flash could be wasted. a.