From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from av.mvista.com (gateway-1237.mvista.com [12.44.186.158]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8541B67A67 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:58:21 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <42275039.7000702@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:58:17 -0700 From: "Mark A. Greer" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Chapman References: <42235B0A.3070302@katalix.com> <422384CA.6090004@mvista.com> <4223977C.4070502@katalix.com> <42239A2D.8070205@mvista.com> <4224C285.6000409@katalix.com> In-Reply-To: <4224C285.6000409@katalix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc4] ppc: add support for Radstone ppc7d boards List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , James Chapman wrote: > Revised patch for Radstone PPC7D board support. > > Signed-off-by: James Chapman > > - use mv64x60_set_bus() to setup for PCI scans rather than > writing to chip P2P_CONFIG registers directly. Looks good, James, except for a couple minor things. If/when you address the comments, please resubmit the entire patch with a proper description so I can forward it on -- http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html Thanks, Mark -- > diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.c b/arch/ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.c > +#if defined(CONFIG_SERIAL_MPSC_CONSOLE) > + mv64x60_mpsc_init(port, uart); Don't you mean "mv64x60_progress_init( );" ? > diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.h b/arch/ppc/platforms/radstone_ppc7d.h >+#define PPC7D_MV64360_REG_BASE 0xfef00000 You don't really need this b/c CONFIG_MV64X60_NEW_BASE should have the correct value.