From: Takeharu KATO <takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp>
To: Joerg Dorchain <joerg@dorchain.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: boot time scheduling hile atomic
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:19:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <423073A9.70404@ybb.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050310072803.GR4017@Redstar.dorchain.net>
Hi Joerg:
> I came to the same idea. This explains as well why the i386 party does
> not notice the effect, as their first interrupt happen later (different
> HZ value)
>
As far as I know, current HZ value for PPC is 1000
as same as i386 family.
Please see following:
-- include/asm-i386/param.h
1 #ifndef _ASMi386_PARAM_H
2 #define _ASMi386_PARAM_H
3
4 #ifdef __KERNEL__
5 # define HZ 1000 /* Internal kernel timer
frequency */
-- include/asm-i386/param.h
-- include/asm-ppc/param.h
1 #ifndef _ASM_PPC_PARAM_H
2 #define _ASM_PPC_PARAM_H
3
4 #ifdef __KERNEL__
5 #define HZ 1000 /* internal timer frequency */
6 #define USER_HZ 100 /* for user interfaces in
"ticks" */
-- include/asm-ppc/param.h
FYI, Kernel preemption ought not to be taken place at this point,
because preemption count is a positive number.
According to my observation, the problem occur on second call of
proc_root_init.But I could not who call it.
IIRC,the value of LR(link register) pointed at the start of BSS.
Regards,
--
Takeharu KATO
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-10 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-03 12:44 GCC4 fun Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-03 13:13 ` Marc Leeman
2005-03-03 13:46 ` evilninja
2005-03-03 14:18 ` boot time scheduling hile atomic (was: GCC4 fun.) Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-04 7:57 ` Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-04 15:06 ` boot time scheduling hile atomic _evil
2005-03-10 4:51 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-10 7:28 ` Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-10 16:19 ` Takeharu KATO [this message]
2005-03-11 6:19 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 0:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-16 5:24 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 5:49 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 6:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-16 14:07 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-17 0:46 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-11 22:21 ` boot time scheduling while atomic Takeharu KATO
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-10 14:23 boot time scheduling hile atomic Rune Torgersen
2005-06-14 12:41 ` Takeharu KATO
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=423073A9.70404@ybb.ne.jp \
--to=takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp \
--cc=joerg@dorchain.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).