From: Takeharu KATO <takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp>
To: Joerg Dorchain <joerg@dorchain.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: boot time scheduling while atomic
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 07:21:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <423219FF.2080400@ybb.ne.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050310072803.GR4017@Redstar.dorchain.net>
Hi
>
> I came to the same idea. This explains as well why the i386 party does
> not notice the effect, as their first interrupt happen later (different
> HZ value)
>
FYI, i386 party's kernel_thread function calls do_fork directly,
however, do_fork is called via syscall trap(clone syscall) in powerpc.
So, this difference may be taken place.
IMHO, from this point of view, the real fix for this problem is change
the way to implement kernel_thread function of PowerPC like as other
architecture does.
Regards,
--
Takeharu KATO
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-11 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-03 12:44 GCC4 fun Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-03 13:13 ` Marc Leeman
2005-03-03 13:46 ` evilninja
2005-03-03 14:18 ` boot time scheduling hile atomic (was: GCC4 fun.) Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-04 7:57 ` Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-04 15:06 ` boot time scheduling hile atomic _evil
2005-03-10 4:51 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-10 7:28 ` Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-10 16:19 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-11 6:19 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 0:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-16 5:24 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 5:49 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 6:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-16 14:07 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-17 0:46 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-11 22:21 ` Takeharu KATO [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=423219FF.2080400@ybb.ne.jp \
--to=takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp \
--cc=joerg@dorchain.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).