linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Viketoft <jakob.viketoft@bitsim.se>
To: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
Cc: Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
	Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Andrei Konovalov <akonovalov@ru.mvista.com>,
	Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>,
	Linux PPC Embedded list <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Flat OF Device Tree for ppc32 [was: Platform bus/ppc sys	model...]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:54:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <425E3DC6.7030007@bitsim.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1113235114.9846.11.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>

Has any more happened on this off-list, or it is just in testing-mode 
right now?

I applied the changes to a 2.6.12-rc2 tree (with some minor rejects to 
sort out) and it compiles and boots fine on my Memec FF1152 board with 
the Virtex-II Pro chip (Xilinx ML300 config).

A couple of small changes to be able to use the simple boot-loader is below.

Cheers!

	/Jakob

diff -ruN org-nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/embed_config.c 
nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/embed_config.c
--- org-nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/embed_config.c 
2005-04-04 18:38:03.000000000 +0200
+++ nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/embed_config.c 
2005-04-14 11:36:49.000000000 +0200
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
  #endif
  extern unsigned long timebase_period_ns;

+#include <syslib/fw_bdt.h>
+
  /* For those boards that don't provide one.
  */
  #if !defined(CONFIG_MBX)
@@ -776,8 +778,7 @@
         bd->bi_intfreq = XPAR_CORE_CLOCK_FREQ_HZ;
         bd->bi_busfreq = XPAR_PLB_CLOCK_FREQ_HZ;
         bd->bi_pci_busfreq = XPAR_PCI_0_CLOCK_FREQ_HZ;
-       timebase_period_ns = 1000000000 / bd->bi_tbfreq;
-       /* see bi_tbfreq definition in 
arch/ppc/platforms/4xx/xilinx_ml300.h */
+       timebase_period_ns = 1000000000 / bd->bi_intfreq;
  }
  #endif /* CONFIG_XILINX_ML300 */

diff -ruN org-nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/misc-embedded.c 
nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/misc-embedded.c
--- org-nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/misc-embedded.c 
2005-04-04 18:38:04.000000000 +0200
+++ nobd-linux-2.6.12-rc2/arch/ppc/boot/simple/misc-embedded.c 
2005-04-14 10:22:38.000000000 +0200
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
  #endif

  #include "nonstdio.h"
+#include <syslib/fw_bdt.h>

  /* The linker tells us where the image is. */
  extern char __image_begin, __image_end;


Jon Loeliger wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 12:49, Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> 
>>Please post to the list as an RFC.  Thanks.
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Apologies to those who have received this notice twice.
> I first sent it to the list where it was summarily
> denied for size reasons.
> 
> I have now posted a tgz file here instead:
> 
>     http://www.jdl.com/bdt_cleanup.tgz
> 
> What follows is my original email content.
> 
> 
> OK, for those keeping score over on the U-Boot list, _this_
> message is really intended to be sent to the public list. :-)
> 
> Here (as noted above) are my diffs against a clone of
>     http://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.6
> as last pulled a couple days ago. (*)
> 
> Please consider this a Request For Comments for now.  Feel free
> to apply it and test it out as well, of course. :-)  I'll sign-off
> on it when it has ripened some more and gets a nod or two...
> 
> These changes relocate almost all of the ppcboot.h definitions
> into new files, arc/ppc/syslib/fw_bdt.[ch] and front them
> with a new, shim interface in include/asm-ppc/firmware.h.
> 
> There is a Kconfig option that allows you to select between
> a "bd_t" interface and a non-existant "OF Flat dev tree"
> interface.  Choose wisely (default) for now.  It adds the
> new fw_bdt.o file.
> 
> Some potential gotchas or points to note:
> 
> - As of this patch, no interface to any board should change.
>   This just isolates the scattered bd_t references to one place.
> 
> - On Kumar's advice arch/ppc/boot/simple was totally ignored.
>   For now; this round.  It can be next on the hit parade easily.
>   It holds the last reference to ppcboot.h still.
> 
> - Earlier cut-n-paste of some devices led to me changing a few
>   files over in 68k land to remove some now-obsolete ppcboot.h
>   related comments justs for completeness.
> 
> - I've compiled uImage using defconfigs for the following boards:
> 
>         8560_ads        cpci690         ash             redwood5
>         8540_ads        ads_8272        TQM8260         est8260
>         rpx8260         bseip           mbx             mpc834x_sys
>         ocotea          lite5200        hdpu            lopec
>         TQM860L         rpxlite         radstone_ppc7d  walnut
> 
> - The file include/asm-ppc/ppcboot.h used to contain a nested
>   include of linux/types.h that was tacitly used by many files.
>   In ripping ppcboot.h out of many platform .h files, I've had
>   to add direct #include <linux/types.h> in several places.
>   If your board isn't listed above and it looks really broken,
>   consider if it needs a <linux/types.h>?
> 
> 
> Enjoy,
> jdl
> 
> --
> (*) -- BK is dead.  Long live BK!
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-14  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-30  8:00 Platform bus/ppc sys model Jakob Viketoft
2005-03-30  9:54 ` Sylvain Munaut
2005-03-30 13:52   ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-03-30 15:06     ` Kumar Gala
2005-03-30 16:12       ` Jakob Viketoft
2005-03-30 17:26         ` Kumar Gala
2005-03-31 12:33           ` Jon Masters
2005-03-31 15:55             ` Flat OF Device Tree for ppc32 [was: Platform bus/ppc sys model...] Jon Loeliger
2005-04-04  7:20               ` Jakob Viketoft
2005-04-04  7:31                 ` Jon Masters
2005-04-04 10:56                 ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-04-04 11:01                   ` Jon Masters
2005-04-04 11:08                   ` Jakob Viketoft
2005-04-04 16:45                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-04-04 16:58                     ` Andrei Konovalov
2005-04-04 16:56                       ` Jon Masters
2005-04-07 17:20                   ` Tom Rini
2005-04-07 17:35                     ` Jon Loeliger
2005-04-07 17:49                       ` Tom Rini
2005-04-11 15:58                         ` Jon Loeliger
2005-04-14  9:54                           ` Jakob Viketoft [this message]
2005-04-15 14:22                             ` Jon Loeliger
2005-04-22 17:33                             ` Andrei Konovalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=425E3DC6.7030007@bitsim.se \
    --to=jakob.viketoft@bitsim.se \
    --cc=akonovalov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=jdl@freescale.com \
    --cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=tnt@246tNt.com \
    --cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).